Lame
laurieboris

saving the world one metaphor at a time

Share this Broadcast

share

Subscribe to this author

subscribe

Message This Author

contact

Star this author

stars

Subscribe

subscribe

Home

go to your pnn homepage

Start_blogging

start blogging

HelpFlag this Broadcast
LOGIN LOGOUT Home
Politics
change, news, views
Green
Living an eco-friendly life
Money & Careers
Building your financial fitness
Family
Moms, dads, kids
Diversions
Kick back, relax
Style
From runway to real world
DIY
handmade, homemade, more
World
Going global
Well-Being
Everything for body and soul
A&E
a dose of 'cultcha'
Living
the good, the bad, the messy
Gossip
Pssst: The scoop on celebs
Contests

Image

About North Korea: Huh?

Posted by laurieboris Posted on: 10/12/08

About North Korea: Huh?

I never agreed with or quite understood the Bush Doctrine (In what respect, Charlie?) and after reading yesterday’s news, I understand it even less. I always thought that North Korea was still part of that “axis of evil” that Bush was always talking about. You know that little triumvirate – Iraq, North Korea, and Iran. We’ve already done away with Iraq, knocking them onto their axis. Iran we’ve yet to invade –er, deal with. Now, for reasons beyond human comprehension, we just crossed off North Korea. Only because they promised to let inspectors come into their country and look at what they’re doing with their plutonium. But only at some locations.

Well, as Garfield the cat used to say, “big, fat, hairy deal.”

Plutonium is only a small part of the picture. We didn’t get a go-ahead from “Dear Leader” to see what the heck they’re doing with uranium enrichment and with their other nuclear goodies, especially the kind that might be built into suitcase bombs and sold to any evil nasty from around the world who can pony up the bucks.

Good job, guys. That’s diplomacy at its best. I cringe at the idea that they’ve already started talking with Iran. So what are they going to walk away with here? A promise that angry mobs are not going to wave those “Death to America” signs on Al Jazeera, if we look the other way on some of that stuff Ahmadinejad has been spouting about wiping Israel off the map?  Oh, right. I can just see how those negotiations are going. “Okay, guys. You stop making us look bad on the air, and we’ll give you Britney Spears and the Internet.”

I see exactly what Bush is doing, and I don’t even work for the State Department. He’s got, oh, seven or so months left until he gets evicted from the White House, and so far that hunt for a positive legacy has eluded him. (Or has deluded him, one or the other.) It’s not looking like he’s getting anywhere with that whole economy thing, and it doesn’t look too good in Iraq, either. So what’s he doing? Sending Condoleezza Rice and her team jetting around the world doing what they should have been doing for the last eight years. Talking to people. You know, that whole diplomacy thing. The one that Barack Obama has been talking about?  The one that John McCain has been criticizing Barack Obama for? The one that you’re supposed to do before you ignore good intelligence and the opinions of your allies and bomb some country into the Stone Age?

There is a problem with waiting to do that. There’s a problem with alienating half the world by not doing that sooner. By waiting until your approval numbers are lower than Richard Nixon’s to do what you should have done the first place looks patently crafted to rank you somewhere a little higher in the history books.

And it’s too little, too late. And now that we’ve given North Korea the upper hand, I cringe to see what might happen next.

Perhaps Bush needs a weapon of mass distraction. Maybe he can see if Monica Lewinsky still has that blue dress.


4Vote!
Links
  • Hee! Good post. I was also confused about the administration's readiness to remove North Korea from the list. I'm not a fan of labeling countries as "evil" just because they don't agree with us, but if the State Dept. is going to make a list of countries that need improvement, we shouldn't be removing them from said list for such blatantly political reasons. It just makes Bush look even sillier than he already does. :P
    By anewphilosophy on October 13, 2008 17:18

  • I don't understand the administration's approach to North Korea, either. But my understanding of the Bush Doctrine is that it has to do with the right for us to launch pre-emptive attacks on countries that we deem to be looming threats. I don't think it matters how we've listed them on any Evil/Good system. He is of the mind that if we decide someone may represent a threat to us, we have the right to preemptively attack before they actually do anything to us and without concern for other nations. This was the doctrine he implemented with Iraq and which is a huge shift from the way we've handled foreign relations in our history. It is also a breach with the United Nations and other global efforts at international relations.
    By allison on October 15, 2008 18:38

Leave a Comment


about us | contact | terms | privacy | advertise | help | press | feedback